Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder in decreasing its coverage" » "coder in decreasing in coverage" (Expand search), "coder in increasing its coverage" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing il coverage" (Expand search), "coder and decreasing its coverage" (Expand search), "coder by decreasing its coverage" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing news coverage" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing cusp coverage" (Expand search), "code in decreasing its coverage" (Expand search), "codes in decreasing its coverage" (Expand search), "poder in decreasing its coverage" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in decreasing its coverage\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in decreasing its coverage ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in decreasing its coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.