Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder in decreasing have contributed" » "coder in decreasing that contributed" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing care contributes" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing which contributed" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing the contributed" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing and contributed" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing over contributed" (Expand search), "coder and decreasing have contributed" (Expand search), "coder by decreasing have contributed" (Expand search), "coder in increasing have contributed" (Expand search), "code in decreasing have contributed" (Expand search), "codes in decreasing have contributed" (Expand search), "poder in decreasing have contributed" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder in decreasing have contributed") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in decreasing have contributed\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in decreasing have contributed ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in decreasing have contributed") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.