Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in affluent python python programming" » "in fluent python python programming" (Expand search), "in affluent pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in affluent piton python programming" (Expand search), "in affluent pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in effluent python python programming" (Expand search), "an affluent python python programming" (Expand search), "in effluents python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder in decoding and programming" » "coder in decoding _ programming" (Expand search), "coder in decoding goal programming" (Expand search), "coder in recording and programming" (Expand search), "coder in coding and programming" (Expand search), "coder in encoding and programming" (Expand search), "coder and decoding and programming" (Expand search), "coder _ decoding and programming" (Expand search), "coder in decaying and programming" (Expand search), "code in decoding and programming" (Expand search), "codes in decoding and programming" (Expand search), "poder in decoding and programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in decoding and programming\") OR (\"in affluent python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in decoding and programming ) OR ( in affluent python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in decoding and programming") OR ("in affluent python python programming"))*.