Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder in coding time coverage" » "coder in coding the coverage" (Expand search), "coder in coding live coverage" (Expand search), "coder in coding time average" (Expand search), "coder in holding time coverage" (Expand search), "coder in loading time coverage" (Expand search), "coder in decoding time coverage" (Expand search), "coder non coding time coverage" (Expand search), "coder and coding time coverage" (Expand search), "code in coding time coverage" (Expand search), "codes in coding time coverage" (Expand search), "poder in coding time coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder in coding time coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in coding time coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in coding time coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in coding time coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.