Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder in coding mac coverage" » "coder in coding max coverage" (Expand search), "coder in coding fat coverage" (Expand search), "coder in coding day coverage" (Expand search), "coder in coding vvc coverage" (Expand search), "coder in coding an coverage" (Expand search), "coder in coding at coverage" (Expand search), "coder in decoding mac coverage" (Expand search), "coder non coding mac coverage" (Expand search), "coder and coding mac coverage" (Expand search), "code in coding mac coverage" (Expand search), "codes in coding mac coverage" (Expand search), "poder in coding mac coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in coding mac coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in coding mac coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in coding mac coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.