Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder in coding dead coverage" » "coder in coding and coverage" (Expand search), "coder in coding dead cover" (Expand search), "coder in coding land coverage" (Expand search), "coder in coding dna coverage" (Expand search), "coder in decoding dead coverage" (Expand search), "coder non coding dead coverage" (Expand search), "coder and coding dead coverage" (Expand search), "code in coding dead coverage" (Expand search), "codes in coding dead coverage" (Expand search), "poder in coding dead coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder in coding dead coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in coding dead coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in coding dead coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in coding dead coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.