Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder imputation in conic programming" » "coder imputation in logic programming" (Expand search), "coder imputation in cone programming" (Expand search), "coder imputation in convex programming" (Expand search), "wide imputation in conic programming" (Expand search), "novel imputation in conic programming" (Expand search), "code mutation in conic programming" (Expand search), "coder mutation in conic programming" (Expand search), "coder imputation of conic programming" (Expand search), "coder implantation in conic programming" (Expand search), "coder imputation in cronic programming" (Expand search), "coder imputation in chronic programming" (Expand search), "coder imputation in colonic programming" (Expand search)
"python using python python programming" » "python using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python using piton python programming" (Expand search), "python using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python usando python python programming" (Expand search), "python coding python python programming" (Expand search), "action using python python programming" (Expand search), "python in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder imputation in conic programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder imputation in conic programming\") OR (\"python using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder imputation in conic programming ) OR ( python using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder imputation in conic programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))*.