Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implications on example of" » "code implications on example of" (Expand search), "model implications on example of" (Expand search), "power implications on example of" (Expand search), "coder implications of example of" (Expand search), "coder implications in example of" (Expand search), "coder implications _ example of" (Expand search), "coder implications one example of" (Expand search), "coder implications on examples of" (Expand search), "coder implications an example of" (Expand search), "coder implications on sample of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implications on example of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implications on example of\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implications on example of ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implications on example of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.