Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implications in methods program" » "code implications in methods program" (Expand search), "model implications in methods program" (Expand search), "power implications in methods program" (Expand search), "coder implications _ methods program" (Expand search), "coder implications of methods program" (Expand search), "coder applications in methods program" (Expand search), "coder implications in method program" (Expand search), "coder implications in methods problem" (Expand search), "coder implications in methadone program" (Expand search), "coder implications main methods program" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implications in methods program") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implications in methods program\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implications in methods program ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implications in methods program") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.