Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implications in detection program" » "code implications in detection program" (Expand search), "model implications in detection program" (Expand search), "power implications in detection program" (Expand search), "coder implications in selection program" (Expand search), "coder implications in protection program" (Expand search), "coder implications in protection programs" (Expand search), "coder implications _ detection program" (Expand search), "coder implications of detection program" (Expand search), "coder applications in detection program" (Expand search), "coder implications in detecting program" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implications in detection program\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implications in detection program ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implications in detection program") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.