Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implications coder learning objects" » "code implications coder learning objects" (Expand search), "model implications coder learning objects" (Expand search), "power implications coder learning objects" (Expand search), "coder implications under learning objects" (Expand search), "coder implications over learning objects" (Expand search), "coder implications case learning objects" (Expand search), "coder implications codes learning objects" (Expand search), "coder implications modern learning objects" (Expand search), "coder implications model learning objects" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implications coder learning objects\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implications coder learning objects ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implications coder learning objects") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.