Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implication python algorithm with" » "coder implication within algorithm with" (Expand search), "coder implications within algorithm with" (Expand search), "coder implication on algorithm with" (Expand search), "code implications python algorithm with" (Expand search), "model implication python algorithm with" (Expand search), "power implications python algorithm with" (Expand search), "coder implication pynthon algorithm with" (Expand search), "coder implication python algoritmo with" (Expand search), "coder implication pattern algorithm with" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implication python algorithm with") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implication python algorithm with\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implication python algorithm with ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implication python algorithm with") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.