Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implication in precoder program" » "code implications in precoder program" (Expand search), "model implication in precoder program" (Expand search), "power implications in precoder program" (Expand search), "coder implication in proder program" (Expand search), "coder implication in recovery program" (Expand search), "coder implication in precoce programa" (Expand search), "coder implications in precoder program" (Expand search), "coder implications on precoder program" (Expand search), "coder implication of precoder program" (Expand search), "coder implication in premodern program" (Expand search), "coder implication and precoder program" (Expand search), "coder implication to precoder program" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implication in precoder program") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implication in precoder program\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implication in precoder program ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))*.