Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implication in binary programming" » "code implications in binary programming" (Expand search), "model implication in binary programming" (Expand search), "power implications in binary programming" (Expand search), "coder implications in binary programming" (Expand search), "coder implications on binary programming" (Expand search), "coder implication of binary programming" (Expand search), "coder implication _ binary programming" (Expand search)
"python using python python programming" » "python using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python using piton python programming" (Expand search), "python using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python coding python python programming" (Expand search), "python usando python python programming" (Expand search), "action using python python programming" (Expand search), "python in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implication in binary programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implication in binary programming\") OR (\"python using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implication in binary programming ) OR ( python using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implication in binary programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))*.