Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implication coder routing problem" » "code implications coder routing problem" (Expand search), "model implication coder routing problem" (Expand search), "power implications coder routing problem" (Expand search), "coder implications under routing problem" (Expand search), "coder application code routing problem" (Expand search), "coder implication pour routing problem" (Expand search), "coder implication power routing problem" (Expand search), "coder implication node routing problem" (Expand search), "coder implication powder grouting problem" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implication coder routing problem") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implication coder routing problem\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implication coder routing problem ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implication coder routing problem") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.