Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation using octave programming" » "code implementation using octave programming" (Expand search), "decoder implementation using octave programming" (Expand search), "model implementation using octave programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in octave programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and octave programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation an octave programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation using stage programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation using objective programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation using octa programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation using octrees programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation using oct programming" (Expand search)
"python coding python python programming" » "python codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "action coding python python programming" (Expand search), "python code python python programming" (Expand search), "python codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "python using python python programming" (Expand search), "python coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "python coding pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation using octave programming\") OR (\"python coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation using octave programming ) OR ( python coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation using octave programming") OR ("python coding python python programming"))*.