Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation using log programmer" » "code implementation using log programmer" (Expand search), "decoder implementation using log programmer" (Expand search), "model implementation using log programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation in log programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation and log programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation an log programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation using logic programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation using non programmers" (Expand search), "coder implementation using of programmers" (Expand search), "coder implementation using long programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation using low programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation using lhc programmer" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation using log programmer") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation using log programmer\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation using log programmer ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation using log programmer") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.