Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation using algorithms in" » "code implementation using algorithms in" (Expand search), "decoder implementation using algorithms in" (Expand search), "model implementation using algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder implementation in algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder implementation and algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder implementation an algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder implementation routing algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder implementation mining algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder implementation making algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder implementation using algorithms and" (Expand search), "coder implementation using algorithms _" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation using algorithms in") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation using algorithms in\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation using algorithms in ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation using algorithms in") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.