Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation on threes programming" » "code implementation on threes programming" (Expand search), "decoder implementation on threes programming" (Expand search), "model implementation on threes programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on free programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on phones programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on through programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation of threes programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in threes programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and threes programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on three programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on trees programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in three programming" (Expand search)
"python using python python programming" » "python using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python using piton python programming" (Expand search), "python using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python usando python python programming" (Expand search), "python coding python python programming" (Expand search), "action using python python programming" (Expand search), "python in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation on threes programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation on threes programming\") OR (\"python using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation on threes programming ) OR ( python using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation on threes programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))*.