Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation on in programming" » "code implementation on in programming" (Expand search), "decoder implementation on in programming" (Expand search), "model implementation on in programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation of in programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in in programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and in programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on and programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on _ programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on c programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on an programming" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python c python python programming" (Expand search), "python an python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation on in programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation on in programming\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation on in programming ) OR ( python in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation on in programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.