Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation on boost programming" » "code implementation on boost programming" (Expand search), "decoder implementation on boost programming" (Expand search), "model implementation on boost programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation of boost programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in boost programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and boost programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on cost programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on block programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on robot programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation or boost programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation can boost programming" (Expand search)
"python coding python python programming" » "action coding python python programming" (Expand search), "python code python python programming" (Expand search), "python codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "python codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "python using python python programming" (Expand search), "python coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "python coding pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation on boost programming") OR ("python coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation on boost programming\") OR (\"python coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation on boost programming ) OR ( python coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation on boost programming") OR ("python coding python python programming"))*.