Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation on algorithm in" » "code implementation on algorithm in" (Expand search), "decoder implementation on algorithm in" (Expand search), "model implementation on algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder implementation of algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder implementation in algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder implementation and algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder implementation on algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder implementation an algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder implementation on algorithmic in" (Expand search), "coder implementation on algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder implementation on algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder implementation on algorithm with" (Expand search)
"api on python python programming" » "api on pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api on piton python programming" (Expand search), "api on pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api in python python programming" (Expand search), "api of python python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "ipi on python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "cpi on python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation on algorithm in") OR ("api on python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation on algorithm in\") OR (\"api on python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation on algorithm in ) OR ( api on python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation on algorithm in") OR ("api on python python programming"))*.