Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation in coder programming" » "code implementation in coder programming" (Expand search), "decoder implementation in coder programming" (Expand search), "model implementation in coder programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and coder programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation of coder programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in modern programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in cone programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in order programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in code programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in coer programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in cider programming" (Expand search)
"reaction using python python programming" » "prediction using python python programming" (Expand search), "detection using python python programming" (Expand search), "selection using python python programming" (Expand search), "reaction using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "reaction using piton python programming" (Expand search), "reaction using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "reaction usando python python programming" (Expand search), "reaction in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation in coder programming") OR ("reaction using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation in coder programming\") OR (\"reaction using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation in coder programming ) OR ( reaction using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation in coder programming") OR ("reaction using python python programming"))*.