Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation in coder programmer" » "code implementation in coder programmer" (Expand search), "decoder implementation in coder programmer" (Expand search), "model implementation in coder programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation and coder programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation of coder programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation in border programmes" (Expand search), "coder implementation in borders programme" (Expand search), "coder implementation in leader programmes" (Expand search), "coder implementation in code programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation in coer programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation in cider programmer" (Expand search)
"api on python python programming" » "api on pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api on piton python programming" (Expand search), "api on pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api in python python programming" (Expand search), "api of python python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "ipi on python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "cpi on python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation in coder programmer") OR ("api on python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation in coder programmer\") OR (\"api on python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation in coder programmer ) OR ( api on python python programming ))*.