Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation in coder programmer" » "code implementation in coder programmer" (Expand search), "decoder implementation in coder programmer" (Expand search), "model implementation in coder programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation and coder programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation of coder programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation in border programmes" (Expand search), "coder implementation in borders programme" (Expand search), "coder implementation in leader programmes" (Expand search), "coder implementation in code programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation in coer programmer" (Expand search), "coder implementation in cider programmer" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation in coder programmer\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation in coder programmer ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation in coder programmer") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.