Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation in cobit programming" » "code implementation in cobit programming" (Expand search), "decoder implementation in cobit programming" (Expand search), "model implementation in cobit programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and cobit programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation of cobit programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in conic programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in robot programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in cobia programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation on cobit programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation in cobalt programming" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python c python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation in cobit programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation in cobit programming\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation in cobit programming ) OR ( python in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation in cobit programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.