Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation and tobit programming" » "code implementation and tobit programming" (Expand search), "decoder implementation and tobit programming" (Expand search), "model implementation and tobit programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation of tobit programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and robot programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and conic programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and cobol programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and tobiata programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and probit programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and tomita programming" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python c python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder implementation and tobit programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation and tobit programming\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation and tobit programming ) OR ( python in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation and tobit programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.