Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation and robot programming" » "code implementation and robot programming" (Expand search), "decoder implementation and robot programming" (Expand search), "model implementation and robot programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation of robot programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and robots programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and goal programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and cone programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and robotic programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and robust programming" (Expand search)
"section using python python programming" » "selection using python python programming" (Expand search), "reaction using python python programming" (Expand search), "detection using python python programming" (Expand search), "section using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "section using piton python programming" (Expand search), "section using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "section usando python python programming" (Expand search), "section in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation and robot programming\") OR (\"section using python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation and robot programming ) OR ( section using python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation and robot programming") OR ("section using python python programming"))*.