Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implementation and plc's programming" » "code implementation and plc's programming" (Expand search), "decoder implementation and plc's programming" (Expand search), "model implementation and plc's programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation of plc's programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and plc programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and c programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and block programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and places programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and plans programming" (Expand search), "coder implementation and plays programming" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python c python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implementation and plc's programming\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implementation and plc's programming ) OR ( python in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implementation and plc's programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.