Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions using reaction programming" » "coder functions using reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using creation programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using reactive programing" (Expand search), "power functions using reaction programming" (Expand search), "order functions using reaction programming" (Expand search), "colour functions using reaction programming" (Expand search), "coder function using reaction programming" (Expand search), "coder reactions using reaction programming" (Expand search), "coder functions coupling reaction programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using fractional programming" (Expand search)
"advanced in python python programming" » "advanced in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "advanced in piton python programming" (Expand search), "advanced in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "advanced and python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced _ python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced aids python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions using reaction programming\") OR (\"advanced in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions using reaction programming ) OR ( advanced in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions using reaction programming") OR ("advanced in python python programming"))*.