Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions using octave programming" » "coder functions using stage programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using objective programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using reactive programming" (Expand search), "power functions using octave programming" (Expand search), "order functions using octave programming" (Expand search), "colour functions using octave programming" (Expand search), "coder function using octave programming" (Expand search), "coder reactions using octave programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using octa programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using octrees programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using oct programming" (Expand search)
"based instruction python python programming" » "based instruction method python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction to python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction on python programming" (Expand search), "assisted instruction python python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction pythons python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction piton python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions using octave programming") OR ("based instruction python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions using octave programming\") OR (\"based instruction python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions using octave programming ) OR ( based instruction python python programming ))*.