Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions using logical programming" » "coder functions using logic programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using goal programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using conic programming" (Expand search), "power functions using logical programming" (Expand search), "order functions using logical programming" (Expand search), "colour functions using logical programming" (Expand search), "coder function using logical programming" (Expand search), "coder reactions using logical programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using local programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using topical programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using lexical programming" (Expand search)
"advanced with python python programming" » "advances with python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced weight python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced water python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced with pythons python programming" (Expand search), "advanced with piton python programming" (Expand search), "advanced with pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions using logical programming\") OR (\"advanced with python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions using logical programming ) OR ( advanced with python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions using logical programming") OR ("advanced with python python programming"))*.