Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions using affective processing" » "coder functions using reactive processing" (Expand search), "coder functions using predictive processing" (Expand search), "coder functions using cognitive processing" (Expand search), "power functions using affective processing" (Expand search), "order functions using affective processing" (Expand search), "colour functions using affective processing" (Expand search), "coder function using affective processing" (Expand search), "coder reactions using affective processing" (Expand search), "coder functions using effective processing" (Expand search), "coder functions using active processing" (Expand search), "coder functions in affective processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions using affective processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions using affective processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions using affective processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.