Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions status allocation problem" » "coder functions status location problem" (Expand search), "coder functions state allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder functions static allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder functions station allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder function status allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder functional status allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder functioning status allocation problem" (Expand search), "power functions status allocation problem" (Expand search), "order functions status allocation problem" (Expand search), "colour functions status allocation problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions status allocation problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions status allocation problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions status allocation problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.