Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions predicts active programmer" » "coder functions predict active programmer" (Expand search), "coder function predicts active programmer" (Expand search), "coder functions predicted active programmer" (Expand search), "coder functions predicts action programme" (Expand search), "coder functions predicts active program" (Expand search), "coder functions predicts archive programme" (Expand search), "power functions predicts active programmer" (Expand search), "order functions predicts active programmer" (Expand search), "colour functions predicts active programmer" (Expand search), "coder functions predicts acute programmer" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions predicts active programmer") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions predicts active programmer\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions predicts active programmer ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions predicts active programmer") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.