Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions predicting algorithm in" » "coder function prediction algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder functions predict algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder functions predicted algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder functions prediction algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder functions predictive algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder functions prediction algorithms in" (Expand search), "power functions predicting algorithm in" (Expand search), "order functions predicting algorithm in" (Expand search), "colour functions predicting algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder functions predicting algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder functions predicting algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder functions predicting algorithm with" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions predicting algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions predicting algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions predicting algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions predicting algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.