Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions predicted in programmers" » "coder functions predict in programmers" (Expand search), "coder function predicts in programmers" (Expand search), "coder functional predicates in programmers" (Expand search), "power functions predicted in programmers" (Expand search), "order functions predicted in programmers" (Expand search), "colour functions predicted in programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions predicted in programmes" (Expand search), "coder functions predicted non programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions predicted and programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions predicted gain programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions predicted by programmers" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions predicted in programmers\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions predicted in programmers ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions predicted in programmers") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.