Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions predict algorithm parallelization" » "coder functions predict automatic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder function prediction algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder functions public algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder functional prediction algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder functions prediction algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder functions predicting algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder functions predictive algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "power functions predict algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "order functions predict algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "colour functions predict algorithm parallelization" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions predict algorithm parallelization\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions predict algorithm parallelization ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions predict algorithm parallelization") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.