Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions post implementation on" » "coder functions pilot implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functions post implantation on" (Expand search), "coder functions project implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functions post implementation of" (Expand search), "coder functions post implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions post implementation and" (Expand search), "power functions post implementation on" (Expand search), "order functions post implementation on" (Expand search), "colour functions post implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functions most implementation on" (Expand search), "coder function post implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functions 1st implementation on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions post implementation on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions post implementation on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions post implementation on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.