Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions parallel imputation in" » "coder functions parallel computation in" (Expand search), "coder functions parallel importation in" (Expand search), "coder functions parallel computations in" (Expand search), "coder injunctions parallel imputation in" (Expand search), "coder functions paradoxal imputation in" (Expand search), "coder functions parameter imputation in" (Expand search), "power functions parallel imputation in" (Expand search), "order functions parallel imputation in" (Expand search), "colour functions parallel imputation in" (Expand search), "coder functions parallel mutation in" (Expand search), "coder functions parallel imputation of" (Expand search), "coder functions parallel implantation in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions parallel imputation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions parallel imputation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions parallel imputation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.