Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions on implementation in" » "coder functions an implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions and implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions _ implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions on implementation and" (Expand search), "coder functions on implementation of" (Expand search), "power functions on implementation in" (Expand search), "order functions on implementation in" (Expand search), "colour functions on implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions of implementation in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions on implementation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions on implementation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions on implementation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions on implementation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.