Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions on description from" » "coder functions on descriptions from" (Expand search), "coder functions on description of" (Expand search), "coder functions on description and" (Expand search), "power functions on description from" (Expand search), "order functions on description from" (Expand search), "colour functions on description from" (Expand search), "coder functions in description from" (Expand search), "coder functions and description from" (Expand search), "coder functions _ description from" (Expand search), "coder functions of description from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions on description from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions on description from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions on description from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.