Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions numeric implementation in" » "coder functions numerical implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions generic implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions dmaic implementation in" (Expand search), "coder foundations numerics implementation in" (Expand search), "coder funciones numericas implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions numeric implementation and" (Expand search), "coder functions numeric implementation of" (Expand search), "power functions numeric implementation in" (Expand search), "order functions numeric implementation in" (Expand search), "colour functions numeric implementation in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions numeric implementation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions numeric implementation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions numeric implementation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.