Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions java implementation on" » "coder functions java implementations on" (Expand search), "coder functions paa implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functions naa implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functions java implementation of" (Expand search), "coder functions java implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions java implementation and" (Expand search), "power functions java implementation on" (Expand search), "order functions java implementation on" (Expand search), "colour functions java implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functions data implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functions and implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functions are implementation on" (Expand search)
"using using python python programming" » "using using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using using piton python programming" (Expand search), "using using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using usando python python programming" (Expand search), "using in python python programming" (Expand search), "using fusing python python programming" (Expand search), "housing using python python programming" (Expand search), "nursing using python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions java implementation on") OR ("using using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions java implementation on\") OR (\"using using python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions java implementation on ) OR ( using using python python programming ))*.