Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions in structure programming" » "coder functions in structured programming" (Expand search), "coder functions in secure programming" (Expand search), "coder functions in future programming" (Expand search), "power functions in structure programming" (Expand search), "order functions in structure programming" (Expand search), "colour functions in structure programming" (Expand search), "coder functions in structures programming" (Expand search), "coder functions on structure programming" (Expand search), "coder functions in structural programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions in structure programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions in structure programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions in structure programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.