Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions in reactive programming" » "coder functions in objective programming" (Expand search), "coder functions in teaching programming" (Expand search), "coder functions in declarative programming" (Expand search), "power functions in reactive programming" (Expand search), "order functions in reactive programming" (Expand search), "colour functions in reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder functions and reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder functions c reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder functions by reactive programming" (Expand search)
"based instruction python python programming" » "based instruction method python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction on python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction to python programming" (Expand search), "assisted instruction python python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction pythons python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction piton python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions in reactive programming") OR ("based instruction python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions in reactive programming\") OR (\"based instruction python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions in reactive programming ) OR ( based instruction python python programming ))*.