Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions implications upon programmers" » "coder function implications upon programmers" (Expand search), "coder functional implications upon programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions applications upon programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions implications on programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions implications of programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions implications in programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions implications non programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions implications blind programmers" (Expand search), "power functions implications upon programmers" (Expand search), "order functions implications upon programmers" (Expand search), "colour functions implications upon programmers" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions implications upon programmers\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions implications upon programmers ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions implications upon programmers") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.