Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions et description of" » "power functions et description of" (Expand search), "order functions et description of" (Expand search), "colour functions et description of" (Expand search), "coder functions set description of" (Expand search), "coder functions nest description of" (Expand search), "coder functions _ description of" (Expand search), "coder functions at description of" (Expand search), "coder functions ef description of" (Expand search), "coder functions 4th description of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions et description of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions et description of\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions et description of ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions et description of") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.