Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions discourse implications on" » "coder functions disease implications on" (Expand search), "coder functions disorder implications on" (Expand search), "coder functions discharge complications on" (Expand search), "coder functional discourse implications on" (Expand search), "coder functional discource implications on" (Expand search), "coder functinal discourse implications on" (Expand search), "power functions discourse implications on" (Expand search), "order functions discourse implications on" (Expand search), "colour functions discourse implications on" (Expand search), "coder functions discourse implications of" (Expand search), "coder functions discourse implications in" (Expand search), "coder functions discourse implications _" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions discourse implications on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions discourse implications on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions discourse implications on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.