Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions discourse applications in" » "coder functions discourse implications in" (Expand search), "coder functions discourse aphorizations in" (Expand search), "coder functions disorder applications in" (Expand search), "coder functional discourse applications in" (Expand search), "coder functional discource applications in" (Expand search), "coder functinal discourse applications in" (Expand search), "power functions discourse applications in" (Expand search), "order functions discourse applications in" (Expand search), "colour functions discourse applications in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions discourse applications in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions discourse applications in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions discourse applications in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.